I won't go into details on Robertson's overly graphic scenario, as I don't think that it was a good example at all and it did far more harm than good. Obviously, most Christians wouldn't be violent criminals if they happened to be atheists, and most atheists are not violent criminals; like most Christians, they are decent human beings. Yet, atheism has it's fair share of subscribers who have killed for the cause. Heinrich Himmler, Joseph Goebbels, Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao Zedong, and the Kim Dynasty of North Korea all have their hands soaked in the blood of the followers of the religions that they tried to stamp out. A religion or lack thereof doesn't make the person automatically commit acts of horror and violence, but neither does it automatically make someone a better, more charitable and compassionate person. Our choices, regardless of our beliefs, are ours and ours alone to make. Yet, the source of the morality and values behind those choices must also be pondered and taken into consideration, hence my writing. But first, a little backstory to set the stage for this and subsequent blogs.
I first experienced atheism in high school. It's a time when many people are growing and changing. Many of my friends were renouncing God and becoming atheists. They quoted atheistic thinkers and proclaimed themselves to be "free-thinkers." They also became more bitter, angry, and aggressive. The mere mention of the name of Jesus was like nails on chalkboard to them. It often led to clashes and arguments. Yet, the worst thing that I could see about atheism was a bleak nothingness. All feelings, emotions, and desires were some kind of chemical, and it didn't matter for whom you felt them. The world had existed before and would exist after you, and in the great scheme of things, you life really didn't matter. In the end, you would die, rot, and be forgotten. Strip away a conscience, a soul, a purpose, and you're left with nothing but a growing meat bag on bones that's out to do an activity that many consider enjoyable that results in more little meat bags. You have no reason to exist other than for yourself in what fleeting time that you have.
Why, then, be decent to others? Why care? One could say, "It's the right thing to do" or "We need to help each other." A common atheist argument, and the popular one against Mr. Robertson is, "If you wouldn't do anything good for anyone else without Jesus telling you to do so, you're a <insert your favorite insult here>."
Here's my counter as a Christian: That's all well and good, but where do you suppose that notion or desire to help comes from? Why do you feel good when you help others? It can't be self-preservation, as you are spending your precious time alive that you could be spending enjoying yourself and making money to enjoy yourself. It can't be the herd instinct either, because why would you help a complete stranger? Plus, instincts don't leave you with a choice, you simply act, as an animal would. No, you have two options with something within you telling you which one to choose and you can either obey that something or disobey it. Something is telling all of us, believers and non-believers, in every decision that we make, how to act. So, in other words, we all must be <insert your favorite insult here>'s because something is beckoning to us and calling us from within.
Is that something God? Centuries of thinkers from Sts. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas to C.S. Lewis seem to think so. My own experience has been that accepting that it is God has answered several other questions like, "Do I matter? Why or why not?" "What is my purpose?" It's led me to have a far better life than I otherwise would have. It hasn't stopped me from questioning or wondering, but I've always found a satisfactory answer.
Bottom line: Would I be a decent person if I were an atheist? Probably. Would I still care about other people and help them? Probably. Would I be living in denial of something greater than myself, and a calling from that something? Definitely.